๐Ÿšš at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.7/5 from 631+ reviews
Menโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

ORIGINAL TRUNK 5 PACK - Trunks

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.7 out of 5(631 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$64.99​
$108.32
Sale
โœ“ at no charge dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Rise : NormalArticle number : TO182O09T-K11

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

ORIGINAL TRUNK 5 PACK - Trunks

Rise : Normal
Article number : TO182O09T-K11

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Men products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1498189

Category: Men > Clothing > Underwear & Socks

Original Price:$108.32 USD

Sale Price:$64.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.7
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 4407 reviews
AP
Adam Parker โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Orlando, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding quality
After a few days, it feels okay and it works for me. Packaging was elementary.
28 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท St. Louis, MO

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
magnificent investment
From my experience, the ORIGINAL TRUNK 5 PACK - Trunks works fine which is good enough.
11 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Colorado Springs, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Highly satisfied
To be fair, it performs as expected which is good enough.
28 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท San Francisco, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fabulous quality
After various use, it does the job which feels reasonable.
28 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 weeks ago ยท Louisville, KY
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
A must-have
The ORIGINAL TRUNK 5 PACK - Trunks is smaller than I expected, but still usable.
37 people found this helpful